 rpennell
rpennell
    
          
          
        My feedback
22 results found
- 
3 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
94 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
2 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·An error occurred while saving the comment 
- 
6 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
2 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
2 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
3 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
3 votes rpennell
    
 shared this idea
           · rpennell
    
 shared this idea
           ·
- 
3 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
8 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
1 vote rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
8 votesI won’t say never, but this feature would be quite difficult currently. We let Revit handle all the loads in the project. It really needs to be handled by Autodesk directly rather than by us.  rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
7 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
118 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  rpennell
    
 commented rpennell
    
 commentedSince lighting control manufacturers still have different means and methods of connecting lighting controls to the fixtures, and adding all of the lighting control wiring to a drawing would complicate the drawing, we use schedules and standard generic details to show the lighting controls for each room. Each room is then part of a schedule that shows the requirements based on Title 24, WAC 51-11, etc, and includes a reference to the wiring detail. It would be nice if: 
 1. The control schedule could be created in DM and insertable with DM; and
 2. The control schedule could be populated with data from the room definitions list rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
3 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  rpennell
    
 commented rpennell
    
 commentedExpand the feature for printing panel schedules to add within the field equipment. Local AHJ (Washington State L&I Electrical Plan Review) requires separate 8.5x11 equipment schedules for panels, switchboards, etc as part of the plan review process. Expand the existing command to print the actual schedule shown on the electrical drawings to print to 8.5x11 AND print to a single .pdf file or printer that can be submitted to L&I EPR. This would save a lot of time setting up 8.5x11 viewports for each panel schedule.  rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
9 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 shared this idea
         · rpennell
    
 shared this idea
         ·
- 
20 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  rpennell
    
 commented rpennell
    
 commentedWe do a lot of low voltage design, and when we circuit on the drawings, the only option for circuiting is a loop. With multiple low voltage systems on one drawing (door locks, intercoms, CCTV, access control, RFID, duress alarms, paging, etc.), looped circuiting looks messy and can be confusing. It would be nice to have other types of circuiting available that is more linear.  rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
1 vote rpennell
    
 shared this idea
           · rpennell
    
 shared this idea
           ·
- 
12 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
6 votes rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           · rpennell
    
 supported this idea
           ·
 
          
I would like to expand this by having oneline equipment scheduled in different groups, i.e. one group for each service so that feeder schedules can be assigned by the service. Otherwise, all the feeders show up on one schedule, but not all the feeders are shown or connected to that specific oneline diagram.