Skip to content

Andrew Beck

My feedback

8 results found

  1. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Beck commented  · 

    Having this option would make designs in industrial areas much cleaner. Right now we are designing equipment to homerun either (1) from the equipment itself or (2) from a junction box that feeds other equipment with the same conductor size. In reality, we'd be using a junction box with multiple wire sizes in the homerun, so our current designs are misleading.

    Andrew Beck supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Beck commented  · 

    To add to this: we'd like a separate circuit callout and homerun callout layer. Since the looping options apply to all device types, we are unable to show homerun + circuit callouts for receptacles while only showing homeruns for lighting. Having separate layers for homerun and circuit callouts would address this.

  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Beck shared this idea  · 
  4. 77 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Beck commented  · 

    I know "branch wires" are mentioned in the wish description, but it would also be nice if feeder wires were upsized based on voltage drop.

  5. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Beck supported this idea  · 
  6. 118 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Beck supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Beck shared this idea  · 
  8. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Beck commented  · 

    DesignMaster currently loops devices using arcs. We'd like an option to change looping from using arcs to use polylines (we differentiate between MC cable and conduits with arcs and polylines, respectively). Ideally these polylines would offset themselves similar to how feeder polylines are offset during one-line generation.

Feedback and Knowledge Base